RIGHT-WING THREAT

TO

NATIONAL SECURITY

Why are CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS a threat to the National Security of the United States???????

CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS, as a Political Movement, are and have been a grave and gathering threat to the national security of the United States because, from the time of Goldwater, through Reagan, Bush I and now Bush II, CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS, as a movement, have been and are presently engaged in undermining national unity, national feeling and national loyalty; the scattered strands of national sentiment that holds the United States together as a nation, by way of their self-serving greedy pursuit of a political agenda representative solely of the economic and political elite, the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS AND CULTURE, and the DLC-PROFESSIONAL CLASS AND CULTURE, at the expense of the 70% Majority Population of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE.

As the scattered strands of national sentiment that holds the United States together as a nation dissolve, Federal patriotism dissolves with a slow dissolution of national tradition, national community of interest and national organization for government purpose. This process of dissolution of national unity occurs as national cohesion dissolves. The precepts that, as a nation the great mass of the people of the United States holds dear, such as life, liberty, freedom, justice and the pursuit of happiness, are being undermined by the self-serving greed of the CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST MOVEMENT; and, as these precepts are undermined and destroyed by the CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST MOVEMENT, the national unity, national feeling, national loyalty -- the scattered strands of national sentiment that holds the United States together as a nation are undermined and dissolve Federal patriotism as national tradition, national community of interest and national organization for government purpose gives way from representation of all of the great mass of the body politic, with freedom and justice for all, to representation by the economic and political elite solely of and for the economic and political elite, the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and the DLC-PROFESSIONAL CLASS, with freedom and justice for all of the economic and political elite and tyranny, oppression and suppression for everyone else, the 70% majority population of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE.

We the people of the United States, the 70% majority population of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, must awaken from our political stupor that is induced by propaganda, cultural control, cultural design, and political ownership and control of all aspect of the media, both print and broadcast, by the economic and political elite, the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and the PROFESSIONAL CLASS.

We, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, must stand up before it is too late; we must not let freedom and justice for all go quietly into the night without a fight; we must stand up loud and strong and demand, as the 70% majority population of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, that freedom and justice MUST BE FOR ALL and not just the exclusive right of the economic and political elite, the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and the PROFESSIONAL CLASS.

DFA Support of Class

in the Middle???????

The "Class in the Middle" developed the Democratic Leadership Council, DLC, to represent them, and consigned the 70% Majority Population to being SWING VOTERS for the duopolistic interest of DLC Democrats and Conservative RIGHT-WING Republicans; it is, therefore, hard to fathom why Governor Howard Dean as the Leader of the DFA would be on Meet The Press on August 13, 2006, repeatedly declaring support of the "Class in the Middle" that abandoned representation of the Working and Poor Class and Culture, DFA Democrats.

The "Class in the Middle" is the class located between the Elite Capitalist Class, on the top, and the Working and Poor Class, on the bottom, DFA Democrats. The "Class in the Middle" is the Professional Class represented politically by Democratic Leadership Council, DLC, Democrats.

If DFA Democrats are expected to support the "Class in the Middle" that abandoned DFA Democrats, and were the cause of the Democratic Party losing majority control in the government of the United States, what do DFA Democrats get in return? And, what assurances do DFA Democrats have that DLC Democrats won't continue their duopolistic cooperation with the Republican Party that disenfranchised the 70% majority population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, prior to the existence of Democracy For America, DFA.

Support of the DLC Democrat "Class in the Middle" without concrete guarantees of reciprocal support of DFA Democrats and elimination of DLC Democrat/Republican Party Duopoly is foolishness.

Without a commitment from the "Class in the Middle" and their DLC Democrat Leadership to support the Working and Poor Class, DFA Democrats, rather than DLC Democrat/Republican Party Duopoly, the DFA must not provide one-sided support of the "Class in the Middle" contrary to the best interest of the Working and Poor Class and Culture, DFA Democrats.

I am certain that DLC Democrats have figured out by now that they do not have sufficient numbers to hold political power in the government of the United States without the VOTING STRENGTH of DFA Democrats, and DLC Democrats are looking to improve VOTING STRENGTH for their DLC Agenda at the expense of DFA Democrats. DFA Democrats must not be so foolish as to give their votes freely in support of DLC Democrats that abandoned them and left them without political representation since the time of Goldwater.

Culture and Cultural Design

Culture is that which people do that is passed down from one generation to the next and cultural design is the introduction or removal of a cultural practice or tenet “for the sake of its consequences”.

A tenet or practice of culture is a “cause” and a consequence of a tenet or practice of culture is an “effect”; if a practice or tenet of culture is either added or removed as a cause, a practice or tenet of consequence is added or removed as an effect; the process of adding and removing practices and tenets to and from culture, that which is passed down from one generation to the next, for the sake of the consequences is Cultural Design.

Cultural Design may be used to serve either vested interests in a society against the greater good or in the greater good dependent upon how culture is controlled and used for inclusive or exclusive benefit by those who design, control and implement a given cultural design.

Cultural Design that serves the greater good is inclusive of the majority population, is liberal, is progressive, is dynamic and subject to change as the society it serves develops and grows.

Cultural Design that serves a vested minority class interest that is exclusive, is conservative, is regressive, inflexible and opposed to change as the society it serves grows and develops.

In the study of Culture and Cultural Design, it is a most important thing for a student to look closely at both culture and cultural design with academic detachment, and evaluate both culture and cultural design for both the politically liberal and conservative tenets, and what societal class and governmental purposes the culture and cultural design is intended to perpetuate, serve and defend; i.e., the greater good or against the greater good as a weapon.

Culture and Cultural Design can be and has been used as a weapon in the past and is being used as a weapon at present in the public school system of the United States. Cultural Design has been used in the United States to pacify slaves during the time of the “Fathers”, Washington, Jefferson and the like, to pacify the peoples of the Native Nations of the United States during the Colonial Period and to pacify the Working and Poor Class and Culture and eliminate class warfare as a result of oppression, suppression, tyranny and abuse by the economic and political elite in the United States.

Individual people live and die from generation to generation and the only thing that succeeds them is culture. Culture can be used to perpetuate oppression and tyranny from one generation to the next, and culture can be used to perpetuate freedom and democracy from one generation to the next.

When we as citizens are being indoctrinated with culture and cultural design as a matter of education, we must be academically skeptical, so that we are not indoctrinated with culture and cultural design that is designed to perpetuate oppression and tyranny.

The public school system is used by the government to indoctrinate citizens with culture and cultural design that is sanctioned by the State to perpetuate the interests of both the State and the Government; a student must be aware of culture and cultural design and study both with academic detachment because both are used in the interest of the State and the Government, have been used in the interest of the State and the Government in the past and will be used by the State and the Government in the future, either in or contrary to the best interest of the people of the Nation. It is, therefore, unwise to be indoctrinated with a culture and cultural design intended to be passed from one generation to the next, if the culture and cultural design that is being indoctrinated is contrary to the best interests of a citizen and the best interest of a citizen’s existing class and culture.

Bibliography:

Adams, David Wallace, "Education For Extinction". Lawrence, Kansas

66049: University Press of Kansas, 1995.

Hume, David, "A Treatise of Human Nature". Oxford, New York: Oxford

University Press, 2000, Library of Congress Cataloging in

Publication Data, Hume, David, 1711-1776.

Merriam, Charles Edward, "The Making of Citizens". Chicago, Illinois:

The University of Chicago Press, 1931.

Skinner, Burris Frederic (B.F.), "Science and Human Behavior". New York,

New York: The Macmillan Company, 1953, Third Printing 1957.

"The Democrats"

Why is it that ALL the Pundits and talking heads in ALL the Media talk about the Democratic Leadership Council, DLC, democrats as being "The Democrats" when, in fact, this minority, this tiny cult of duopolistic bobble-headed usurpers of political power in the Democratic Party DO NOT REPRESENT "THE GRASSROOTS MAJORITY" OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, "The Democrats", who are the grassroots majority of the Democratic Party, not the tiny clique of DLC usurpers that infest the leadership of the Democratic Party?

The grassroots majority are not for conservative politics as Professor Charles Edward Merriam, a Political Scientist in the University of Chicago, in his book, "The Making of Citizens" indicates, "In the United States, if we followed the Fathers' example literally, we would disfranchise over three-fourths of our voters, re-establish human slavery, set up property and religious qualifications for office, re-establish religions, set up penal and reformatory institutions of the most primitive type, and rebuild a whole series of institutions which we should find absolutely intolerable and impossible."

"The DLC Democrats", the tiny cult of duopolistic bobble-headed usurpers that infest the leadership of the Democratic Party contrary to the best interest of the Grassroots Majority of the Democratic Party are NOT "The Democrats".

"The Democrats" are the grassroots majority of the Democratic Party that are doing all that they can do to get the Lieberman-like infestation out of Democratic Party leadership, and the grassroots majority of the Democratic Party DO NOT support conservative politics as previously stated by Professor Merriam. The grassroots majority of the Democratic Party support Liberal Progressive politics that favor the greater good, that is inclusive, rather than exclusive.

Stand Up For America

Legislating a common language, English, for all of the people of the United States is not sufficient to maintain national cohesion when the precepts of life, liberty, justice, freedom and the pursuit of happiness enshrined in the Constitution is legislated, ajudicated and proclaimed by Executive Authority to be for all of us, the economic and political elite, the Elite Capitalist Class and the Professional Class, "Maybe Not YOU", the 70% majority population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture. Freedom and justice for all of "us", "Maybe Not YOU", is not sufficient freedom and justice to maintain the 70% majority population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, as a nationally cohesive part of the body politic of the United States.

The actions of the Conservative Right-Wing Republican EXTREMISTS are having a divergent effect on the 70% majority population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, and in time if the Conservative Right-Wing EXTREMIST MOVEMENT is allowed to continue unimpeded this destructive political movement, that is in the interest solely of the economic and political elite, will demonstrate that it is a danger to the national security of the United States by way of its progressive weakening of national cohesion that can and will in time lead to a political realignment and possible dissolution of the United States as a nation.

We the people of the United States, all of the people of the United States, must get this dangerous cult of the political and economic elite, this Conservative Right-Wing Republican EXTREMIST MOVEMENT, under control before its effects are irreversible. We must look to the greater good that is inclusive of the 70% majority population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, rather than the exclusive good of the political and economic elite.

The price of freedom is vigilance. If you love your country, the United States of America, protect it from destruction by way of the greed of the Elite Capitalist Class and the Professional Class, the economic and political elite that seem Hell bent upon destroying our country, the United States of America, in pursuit of their own greedy benefit at the expense of the 70% majority population of the United States.

U.S. Definition of Terrorism


U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2331, U.S. Definition of Terrorism: Activities that appear to be intended to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnaping. See following links:


http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002331----000-.html

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=2331


This being the U.S. definition of terrorism, the question is, if terrorists or a terrorist nation attacks other terrorists or another terrorist nation, is it a terrorist act? and does it matter? Since terrorist have eliminated terrorists and reduced the terrorist threat to non-terrorist and non-terrorist nations.


By definition of U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2331, George W. Bush and his entire administration are terrorists and the United States is a non-terrorist nation. We as a nation, the United States, have been contaminated by a gang of conservative right-wing Republican terrorists. What are we the people going to do about it?

**First, we need to impeach Bush and his entire administration.

**Second, we need to give Bush and his entire administration a fair trial, and

**Third, we need to consign Bush and his entire administration to one of their own black prisons in the Gitmo gulag where they will not be a threat to National Security. What else can we do? They know too much.

Liberal Solution to Conservative Government (cont.)


The following are additional quotations from Professor Charles Edward Merriam's book, "THE MAKING OF CITIZENS - A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training", that indicate what results can be expected from Conservative Government:

"In the United States, if we followed the Fathers' example literally, we would disfranchise over three-fourths of our voters, re-establish human slavery, set up property and religious qualifications for office, re-establish religions, set up penal and reformatory institutions of the most primitive type, and rebuild a whole series of institutions which we should find absolutely intolerable and impossible."

"The past may readily be made a defense for vested wrongs as well as for vested rights. Probably the most common defense of a notoriously selfish interest is to cover itself with an alleged group or unselfish interest. In this case, all the teachings of tradition are capitalized against the group itself, and in reality the intelligence of the community is directed against itself."

"The significance of fidelity to the past in any group is very great, but beyond a certain point what was originally meat becomes poison. The distortion of loyalty may, in effect, be disloyalty. Or, from another point of view, the exaggeration of loyalty may become intolerance, bigotry, and oppressiveness of the most odious form, designed, however, to protect the interests of some selfish individual or group. In no atmosphere does the demagogue thrive more freely than in that of excited intolerance and over inflamed civic enthusiasm built upon over emphasized tradition."

Do we the people want Conservative Government of the right-wing Republican EXTREMISTS, George W. Bush and the Bush administration, or do we want Liberal Progressive Government as expressed in the following quote also from Professor Merriam:

"Here the puzzled citizen finds that many difficult choices must be made. He can, of course, follow his impulses or his emotions or the beating of the ready tom-toms, but these may not be satisfactory guides, either for him or for the community. What he must really do in cases where the community is usefully served is to distinguish between the genuine and the sham, between the sound and the unsound, between types of behavior that are useful for his group and those that are dangerous."

"The watchword of modern life is change and adjustment, even to the point of restlessness and dissatisfaction. Unquestionably, readjustment is, and for some time will continue to be, a larger part of the life of our time, at least in the Western world. Politics cannot continue to live upon tradition and force, two of its great allies in the past, but must rely upon invention, adaptation, adjustment, if it is to continue as a useful part of that modern life in which conscious control over human evolution looms up larger and larger."

As I have previously said, Charles Edward Merriam was a Professor of Political Science in the University of Chicago and published "THE MAKING OF CITIZENS" in 1931 and indicates in a further quote that his work can be used for both constructive and destructive purpose:

"Furthermore, these tendencies are applicable in great measure to all modern forms of political order, and are likely to be utilized by any of them, with such variations as are necessary for the purposes of the special form of government, or ethnic group, or geographical area. Communism, democracy, Fascism, monarchy, Occident, and Orient are likely to find developments in this direction underlying the growth of their civic educational plans. Even outlaw gangs, that profess to be outside the law, may find the modern devices useful in maintaining the level of moral and solidarity necessary for their purposes."

"It is not unlikely, however, that state-makers outside the Western group may take over the very elements in our political educational process which we are beginning to find least useful from a modern point of view, such as over emphasis on traditions and the accompaniment of pseudo-scientific historical propaganda, rigid indoctrination of ideologies, artificial development of the political outside of its integrated social setting, failure to consider the constitutional (physical-mental) relations of civic education, lack of intergroup education, and inadequate attention to scientific pedagogy of civic training. It is therefore not out of the question that these suggestions regarding the nature of political education may have some value for students and builders of civic moral in a variety of states just coming to national consciousness and activity."

The Conservative right-wing Republican EXTREMIST MOVEMENT, George W. Bush and the Bush administration, has subjected the American people to Professor Merriam's techniques of political science in a destructive way that serve their own selfish interests, rather than for the greater good of the American people as a whole.

It is time to make a choice, do we, the American people, want to support Conservative Government against our own best interest, or do we want to support Liberal Progressive Government that IS in our own best interest? I choose Liberal Progressive Government that IS in the best interest of the greater good for the American people as a whole.

Liberal Solution to Conservative Government

Both the problems of Conservative Politics and Government and the Liberal Solution to Conservative Politics and Government are addressed by Professor Charles Edward Merriam in the following quote from his book published in 1931, "The Making of Citizens - A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training". Professor Merriam was the Professor of Political Science in the University of Chicago:

"It would be a supreme tragedy if government alone still worshiped at the shrine of the past, satisfying itself with the symbols and ceremonials of outlived situations. For this can only mean that the new masters of mob psychology weave out the pattern of traditionalism the cloaks for their own daring enterprises in popular confusion and control. The demagog and the rogue will not fail to utilize the prejudices, the hates, and the bigotries of mankind for their own purposes, and with their tongues in their cheeks take over the government of mankind in the name of the supreme order of the charlatan."

"Another statesmanship might not be so misled. It could recognize the role of political invention and adjustment in the new world, and the part they must play in the life of the coming citizen. It could provide for the cultivation of discernment and discrimination, for the forward look as well as the backward sweep, for tests of adaptability and inventiveness as well as memory, for appreciation of the inventor and the social technician in the present as well as in the past. It could unfold the political world as a shifting scene with constantly changing situations rather than as a closed book left only to be revered. It could picture the ideal citizen not as a devotee of the past but himself as father and founder, joint creator of a new world. The great values to be drawn from the illustrious past need not be lost, but may be placed in their true light, not as magic or mystery, but as preliminary to the understanding of the possibilities of the greater future."

Professor Merriam has expressed uncommon wisdom that is applicable to our present political situation with the current conservative right-wing Republican EXTREMIST government in the United States. It would be beneficial to have someone of his caliber providing insight for the liberal movement of the progressive left.

Democracy or Dictatorship, it's up to YOU

The problem with freedom and democracy is that it depends upon the 70% Majority Population, the Working and Poor Class and Culture having knowledge and understanding of HISTORY, that they, themselves, recognize as power and control for use by their numbers to democratically elect leadership that WILL enact THEIR will, that is based upon knowledge and understanding of the past, how the past affects the present, and how the future can be shaped in the present, by knowledge and understanding of the past.

Unscrupulous political leaders undermine the knowledge and understanding of the past and how that knowledge and understanding affects BOTH the present and the future by distracting the people, the 70% Majority Population, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, with entertainment and games. This same thing was done in ROME with entertainment and games in the colleseum; and the people, the mob, were distracted by entertainment and games and gradually, generation by generation, the knowledge and understanding of HISTORY, the past, and how it affects the present and the future was lost and, as it was lost, the ROMAN REPUBLIC lost "representative rule" of and by the people through their chosen representatives in the Senate, and "representative rule" was replaced by "autocratic rule" by ROMAN Dictators; first, Julius Caesar and then other dictators that chose Caesar's name as the title designating their "absolute power" as dictator over a ROMAN Autocracy, and the FREEDOM of the Senate to "rule" over the ROMAN REPUBLIC as "representatives of the people" was lost forever.

At the present time as we start the 21st Century, unscrupulous political leaders are intentionally using the Media TV, Radio and Print, and Control of Education in the Public School System to undermine knowledge and understanding of the past and how it affects BOTH the present, and future in the same way that unscrupulous ROMAN Politicians did; and, if the process is not reversed, as the 70% Majority Population, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, is dumbed down, the same result as happened in ROME will happen in the United States.

At the present time, I suspect that the dumbing down of the 70% Majority Population of the United States, the Working and Poor Class and Culture, that will allow a 21st Century Caesar to become Dictator and disband the Congress of the United States is well over 50% ACCOMPLISHED by the RIGHT-WING REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS that want a 21st Century Caesar to lead them in their "Project for the New American Century". See following link:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

We the people of the United States must choose not to be led like sheep and be distracted by the entertainment and games of the New ROMAN Colleseum, the combined CORPORATE MEDIA TV, RADIO and PRINT, and Education in the Public School System that deprives us of our ability to control our own destiny with knowledge and understanding of the past, and how that knowledge affects BOTH the present and the future, because if we do CHOOSE TO BE LED LIKE SHEEP, we will lose our FREEDOM to dictatorship, as surely as the ROMANS did, and the result will be no less disasterous for the United States, as it was disasterous for the ROMAN EMPIRE.

"DFA Movement " MEDIA COVERAGE

Why is it that we, the 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, the CONSTITUENT MAJORITY of the Democratic Party have to put up with Democratic Leadership Council, DLC, REPUBLICANS in Leadership positions of OUR Democratic Party?

We, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, have founded the Democracy For America, DFA MOVEMENT, in order to replace DLC REPUBLICAN Leadership within the Democratic Party, with DFA Democrats, so that the Democratic Party can be properly led by DFA Democrat Leadership that represents the 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the United States, the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE that is the "CONSTITUENT BASE" of the Democratic Party.

Why is it that the Talking Heads on ABC, CBS and NBC NEVER talk about the DFA MOVEMENT within the Democratic Party? Why is it that the DFA MOVEMENT to REFORM the Democratic Party is NEVER DISCUSSED on DISH Satellite Channel 9410, LINK TV or DISH Satellite Channel 9415 FREE SPEECH TV, FSTV?

"Bobble Headed" DLC Republicans

"Bobble Headed" Democratic Leadership Council, DLC, Democrat cooperation with the REPUBLICAN PARTY has changed the Two-Party Political System in the United States into a Two-Party Political Duopoly that is controlled by the REPUBLICAN PARTY.

Democracy For America, DFA, is an organization founded by Governor Howard Dean, M.D. with a mission of building a GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT OF DFA DEMOCRATS to take the Democratic Party back from the "bobble headed" DLC REPUBLICAN Leadership that currently infests the Democratic Party against the best interests of the 70% WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE.

The United States CAN NOT remain a FREE COUNTRY with DLC Republican Leadership that support REPUBLICAN PARTY "duopolistic control" of the Democratic Party. As FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS, we MUST ALL, as a part of the 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the WORKING AND POOR CLASS, support the DFA MOVEMENT to take back the Democratic Party Leadership from control by "bobble headed" DLC REPUBLICAN PARTY DUOPOLISTS currently in control of the Democratic Party and reestablish a FREE and Independent Democratic Party that represents the 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE.

WHAT IS THE "WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE", and WHEN WILL IT ACHIEVE ITS OWN ECONOMY AND MARKETS?

The WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE is the 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the United States that WORK FOR A LIVING, are poor when they are unemployeed, and are APART as a CLASS and CULTURE from the 20% minority population of the PROFESSIONAL CLASS AND CULTURE, the New Class, and the 10% minority population of the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS AND CULTURE.

The WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE has sufficient numbers to form its own Economy and Markets to provide for its own needs, without being used as "passive supporters" of the Joint Economy and Markets of the 10% minority of the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and 20% minority of the PROFESSIONAL CLASS AND CULTURE, when awareness and resolve develops from need due to exclusion from Benefit and Equity in the Joint Economy and Markets of the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and PROFESSIONAL CLASS.

The WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE is a 70% MAJORITY POPULATION of the United States, that has not realized awareness of its own status as a CLASS and CULTURE, and the resultant Benefit and Equity that can be derived by the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE, by seperating the Economy and Markets of the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE from the Economy and Markets of the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and the PROFESSIONAL CLASS.

However, awareness is growing within the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE of the necessity of Benefit and Equity that is not being realized by the WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE from "passive support" of the Economy and Markets of the Joint Economy of the ELITE CAPITALIST CLASS and the PROFESSIONAL CLASS, and as a result it is only a matter of time until meaningful change occurs in the United States with regard to the Economy and Markets, that is equivalent to the results Mahatma Ghandi achieved with regard to REVERSAL of Imperial British domination of the Economy and Markets of India, that returned Benefit and Equity back to India's WORKING AND POOR CLASS AND CULTURE from Imperial Control of the British Empire.